Links to pages on philosophy of science and psychology
Posted by robertpriddy on September 30, 2009
Understanding and Truth. The multiple problem of what truth is seems so confusingly fathomless that there is quite simply no general consensus about it.
It is widely thought in contemporary philosophy that the limits of what is known are, at any time, determined by language.
I told him about scientists who had begged to come with me, some because they wanted to measure Bushman heads and behinds… others to study his family relationships, and one to analyse his spit; but when I asked them etc…
With what kind of questions does a philosophical psychology try to deal? The answer is whatever concerns the problems of human life as seen and experienced from the viewpoint of a person who seeks to understand it.
Much controversy arises or is made out of the question of values; what is meant by ‘values’? Which values are good and which bad, if any? Which values are to be tolerated even if their rightness is controversial?
Few people are not at all concerned to improve their own level of intelligence where possible. One key to doing this is to have a balanced appreciation of what human intelligence is, what are its best qualities.
The understanding of what it is to be a person oneself is the natural and unavoidable basis on which any intelligible psychology necessarily builds.
The psychology of understanding has not been developed to any appreciable extent in Western psychology, neither as regards inter-personal understanding nor understanding as a basic human need.
The crucial role of self-inquiry and self-reliance in all forms of psychic improvement does not mean that therapy cannot be of assistance.
Understanding and Unity. The need for holistic understanding is emerging with increasing persistence in subject after subject as the process of globalization…
(a 13-chapter book critical of the role of the sciences today) Intellectual/social problems due to scientistic beliefs on solving it by Robert C. Priddy Formerly University of Oslo (ret’d)
Science as an institutionalised social activity and scientific theory are in a constant process of change.
The above quote illustrates the dilemma of much contemporary social science: it studies humans physically, as psycho-physical entities.
It is evident that the vast majority of major decisions made by human beings are not based on science.
On the chief causes of a serious decline in intellectual culture on a reformed model
The keystone of science is that everything has a cause, yet how can an act of genuinely free will be caused…
The prevailing attitude of intellectuals in the last decade of the 20th century still appears to exhibit an almost unquestioning belief in science and the secular
The necessity for the science to have freedom to research whatever scientists see as worthwhile has long been as much part of academic ideology.
Information by Robert Priddy (Author of the book “Source of the Dream – My Way to Sathya Sai Baba” Born 1936. British. Researched and taught philosophy and sociology at the University of Oslo 1968-85.
This entry was posted on September 30, 2009 at 9:05 am and is filed under causality, Free will, Holistic psychology, Intelligence, metascience, Past-oriented therapies, Science, scientism, Self-awareness, Understanding. Tagged: Philosophy of Science, Robert C. Priddy, Sathya Sai Baba. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.